I mean beam failure recovery.
Ok, my chipset is different in DSS. Maybe that can be one reason?
X50 in mmwave logs vs X55 in DSS.
I also have a X50 UE and beam failure recovery is configured in n78.
So in X50 UE do you have any of this 2 logs?
Yes, I do have boh of them.
Oh, ok. mmWave?
n78 3.5 GHz TDD.
So maybe your beams >0 so BFR will be there?
But I can’t see in 8 beam mmWave.
You need to check all messages.
RIght. I noticed it now in DSS so went back to mmWave and couldn’t find it.
The Ue need to be capable of SSB RLM :
measAndMobParameters measAndMobParametersCommon ssb-RLM supported
Beam failure is only for R16 UEs.
Cause of RACH should be beam failure, not t310 expiry.
How one could recognise R15, R16 supported device in a box or OEM website?
But I see this UeCP message under RRc Rel 15 for SSB RLM.
But have you seen a RACH with cause beam failure in NR?
No, I haven’t seen any beam failures yet, neither in RACH nor in PDSCH.
I have seen this. In qc device, release 15.
Again, I talk about simulated environment only…