Since FWA is a fixed service, how can I avoid its use as a mobile device?
Initially, I thought about using the PCI Locker function on the CPE at the provisioning. But I guess it would be difficult because it should be done on a per-CPE basis.
Then I thought that a good approach would be using a LADN but in this case in particular the TA have too many cells.
So I ask you guys. What are your opinion or advice to control the CPE mobility in a FWA network?
During the registration procedure the CPE could be configured to limit the mobility using PCI Lock but for some CPE it should be done everytime a reset occurs.
Assuming you already look through closed subscriber group,
I am not 100% certain, but how CBRS control the access for multiple network could be scenarios to benchmark.
I think it’s common CBRS scenario limiting PLMN access based on tracking area.
I’m not totally aware of how the CSG works but as far as I could understand it creates a group of cells accessible only for specific users. Am I right? If so, I guess it’s not feasable in a wide network since it implies that you should have duplicated cells depending on the type of user that tries to connect.
Again, as far as I could think the most adequate approach, even if it not the best one, seems to implement a PCI lock and to create some automation to send the best PCI information to the CPE OTA from time to time or even when the user makes a TAU. What do you think? Have you ever seen this kind of implementation?
If you plan to sell the CPE as self installing, there’s no garantee that the user would be able to perform a survey in order to choose the best place to put the CPE.
In the other hand, if you need to send a technician to do the installation everytime, it would generate an unnecessary and prohibited cost to deploy.
The MNO are planning to sell the nomadic service as a SVA.