Serving Cell RSRQ (dB):
CQI CW 0 Carrier 1:
Serving Cell RSRQ (dB):
CQI CW 0 Carrier 1:
HmmâŚthis sounds like MIMO cabling problem.
Like on one sector you have TX cables from 2 different sectors.
Check MIMO counters to clarify this.
You say that in one antenna you have TX cable of sector 1 or 2 for example?
Yes, maybe.
What Counter do I need to check, please?
Whatâs the site MIMO config 2x2 or 4x4?
Average and max rank indicator.
If MIMO cables are twisted then rank should always be 1 meaning only 1 layer for MIMO spatial multiplexing.
Itâs MIMO 2x2.
Then rank should be always 1 in counters for 2 sectors, not just for one sector.
If you never see samples of 2 layers for mimo then this is it: MIMO cables twisted on site between sectors
Please check counters from several days plotted by hours and see rank indicator or number of layers.
If both are 1 then MIMO cables are twisted.
RI Carrier 1:
So it is always 1 in Drive Test.
This is a good hint I am right.
But check counters for Rank Indicator and MIMO layers.
For cells, in OSS.
Couldnât it cause high VSWR?
No I donât think so.
Itâs just that different signals are radiated on a wrong antenna.
Thatâs all.
So cross feeder alarm?
Nope. No such alarms. Paths are orthogonal +45 and -45 degrees.
Or maybe there is?
Which vendor is it?
Was site like this since integration or it just happens recently?
Vendor is ZTE.
Issue only happening recently.
Site have 3 years in service, and no recent intervention on site recently.
Yes, we need to plot counters of rank and mimo layers to conclude.
It may not be MIMO issue but 2 PCIs having same signal strength coming from pretty much same direction.
So again too much overlapping between cells.
It is weird that 2 PCIs have exactly same RSRP as in your picture.
I think that there are bad connections, because RTWP in sector B donât measure, and in Sector C have one in -104.
Average RSSI ChartsâŚ
Average RSSI Sector A:
Average RSSI Sector B:
Average RSSI Sector C:
Usually policy got wrongly implemented at router end then such cases apear.
This is another problem you have to fix as a flat RTWP.