As we transition from 4G to 5G, the architecture of the core network has undergone significant changes to meet the demands of next-generation connectivity. A key comparison lies between the MME (Mobility Management Entity) in 4G and the AMF (Access and Mobility Management Function) in 5G.
Hereโs how these two nodes differ while sharing some core functionalities:
-
Similarities:
- Both manage UE registration, mobility, and session establishment.
- Handle authentication by interfacing with relevant subscription and authentication systems (HSS in 4G vs. AUSF/UDM in 5G).
- Initiate paging for idle UEs to deliver data or notifications.
- Maintain strong interaction with the RAN (eNodeB in 4G, gNodeB in 5G).
-
Key Differences:
-
Session Management:
In 4G, the MME partially manages sessions, working closely with the SGW/PGW.
In 5G, this responsibility is shifted to the SMF (Session Management Function), allowing the AMF to focus exclusively on signaling and mobility. -
Network Slicing:
AMF supports network slicing, enabling differentiated services within the same network infrastructureโsomething MME doesnโt handle. -
Service-Based Architecture:
AMF operates in a service-based architecture with RESTful APIs, while MME relies on more traditional interfaces.
-
-
Takeaway:
The AMF represents a modular and scalable approach, aligning with 5Gโs design to handle diverse use cases like IoT, enhanced mobile broadband, and ultra-reliable low-latency communications. Meanwhile, the MME reflects the centralized nature of 4G EPC.
The transition from MME to AMF is a testament to the industryโs commitment to creating a flexible, efficient, and future-proof network architecture.
LinkedIn: