UL CA in LTE

UL bler 12%.
I think ok KPI for TDD.

It’s a bit high.
What about CQI?
And BLER?

No.
I discussed around 20% high value.
In TDD just check scenario very different.
CQI 9.5

Normally after 10 its consider high.
As target BLER considered as 10 percent.

Yes as per parameter UL target BLER agree which set 10%.

Go for Comp first.

UL Comp tried, not major benefit.
In cluster only 200 kbps gain in UL throughput.

UL scheduler power what PRB utilization?
But 200 kbps is a good improvment @ankgitm.

Ok sure let me try to correlate all info.
Thanks for good discussion @parkarnadeem86

Is IRC enabled mostly in interference sites?
IRC depends on board too.

Yes IRC is enabled. MRC disabled.
UL scheduling type interference aware scheduling.

Smart IRC is a feature in TDD
In PUSCH IRC.

I have worked on UL256 feature, if you need any help on this let me know.

Please tell any gain observed in UL user/cell throughput.

@ankgitm, just a query: regarding your UL CA improvement, which DU type you are using?

It’s in LTE so eNodeB we have DU and CU in 5G.

Parameter need to be configured. Please share RRC connection reconfiguration content.

Regarding 256QAM?

UL 64 QAM only works on DU type 30 and above.

Sorry, didn’t get what this DU30.
Is it for LTE distributed unit?

This is type of DU we are using DUL or DUS.

Can you print get 0 command?