UE using Contention Based RACH Preamble

Hello,

Contention Based RACH Preamble using for;

  1. RRC Connection Setup
  2. Uplink Data Transmission

NonContentionBased RACH using for;

  1. Handover Process
  2. Downlink Data Transmission

So, it means Connected UE can 3 type of activities with PRACH:

  1. Uplink Data Transmission: If it wants to transport data on uplink way. It should to do ContentionBased R.A process.

  2. Handover: If UE wants to do Handover Process, it should to do NonContentionBased R.A process. But… it is already Connected mode and RACH is a first message to eNB. So, why and how UE can to do it? Because, when UE has bad RSRP value it will be disconnected in the its eNB. So UE want to connect other eNB and it sends NonContention Preamble message to different eNB.

UE doing NonContentionBased process, because we dont want to make wait it when it changing eNB connecting. Because it will be fail trying to connect on ContentionBased Process way.

  1. Downlink Data Transmission: If UE wants to data communication on downlink way, it have to do process of NonContention.

Why UE have to NonContention Process I dont know?
Because it is already connected same eNB. Is it right?

RACH is always not needed for DL data transmission.
One use case i can think of is like this: when UE is in connected mode with data inactivity and timing alignment timer expires at network.
Now, network accumulates some DL buffer for that UE. In this case, even though UE is in connected mode, as timing realignment timer expired at network side, UE is not considered synchronised so, network will trigger PDCCH order to force the UE to start RACH to get the connection resynchronized. Once the RACH is done, connection is considered synchronised so, network can start DL data scheduling.
RACH through PDCCH order is always contention free.

What is meant by PDCCH order?

It is network’s way of forcing the UE to start RACH.

Check PDCCH order in 5G NR

Sending a DCI Format 1_0 on the SSB beam index UE is camped along with a PRACH preamble and RACH occasion.
Does the gNB indicate preamble within the DCI?

Yes, that’s why it’s contention free.

1 Like

Thank you good information!

Handover process RACH can be contention or non contention based as well.

But non contention is required as rach failure can increase during handovers.
Mainly in highly utilised cases.

Hi all 5G / LTE experts.

Is there specific PRACH preambles which is called free and not contention based when UE doing handover?

Of course, none-contention preambles are in group A, the site will assign from these when you’re a HO UE, UL nonesynch UE with downlonm data coming.