Now is the time to take 5G indoors

[Marina]

Probably, it is a media news problem. It works differently.

In practice.

[ali2]

@Marina

How is it work MEC without RAN part? I am sorry. I am not understanding your viewpoint.

I mean that the MEC will help reduce the latency a lot.

[Marina]

@ali2

I mean that the MEC will help reduce the latency a lot.

I think the same.

@RFSpecialist

Well… I can note the spending.

Let me know please when it will match the revenue.

That’s a good question.

But, as I know, Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (USP) is having a public-private partnership for this. That’s the answer.

Deloitte, Itaú Unibanco, Siemens Healthineers, NEC, Telecom Infra Project (TIP), Agência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial (ABDI), Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento (BID), and Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo (Poli-USP).

[RFSpecialist]

But this is a proof of concept, not a profitable business.

[Marina]

It is a new kind of healthcare management.

With other business models and new management.

Sorry again for Portuguese website:

https://tiinside.com.br/15/09/2022/hc-da-usp-instala-rede-privativa-5g-para-melhorias-nos-servicos-de-saude/

[RFSpecialist]

As I said, let us know when this multimillion investment will get profitable.

I would like to remind everyone how other famous technology failed to ramp up even after major investments: 3D TVs and wimax for example.

[Marina]

With public-private partnerships it is possible.

Thank you for your messages. It safe lives, that’s the equation point.

[RFSpecialist]

Videocalls on mobile operators also failed, almost no is at all since all users use OTTs.

@Marina

With public-private partnerships it is possible.

It is good to show off for 10-20 cases but if it doesn’t work o profit it will spread out. Money makes the world go round.

I am just saying that lifes are money dependant.

And personally i would not handle my life to a remote surgery. Doctors fails even in classic style, let alone MNO problems that can occur.

[Marina]

Ok. Thank you very much for your attention dears

Great team here!

5 Life-Changing Tech Innovations That Most People Don’t Understand Yet

[Sivas_Viswa]

@RFSpecialist

I am not sure it needs latency of less than 20 msec…

Specs says 20 msec?

@Marina

With other business models and new management.

Remote ECG BP Xray viewing also needed a low latency. if FH n MH needs <5-6msec spec?

1msec is radio interface induced delay in NR.

[rosdiadee]

@RFSpecialist

Honestly, to setup a camp of remote surgery costs multi millions and you will need internet anyway so why not use wifi?

I don’t think this is a genuine use case of 5G…

I read the translated version of the article and from what I understand they’re based on wifi since 2016.

“Thinking about the future of the hospital, the DINF director still intends to implement 5G technology for connecting medical equipment and the metaverse”.

More like a near future plan.

@javiersapon

I think wifi will not meet the QoS flow requirement in terms of latency in speed.

It is more about the 5GC than the NR RAN.

I agree on this, since remote telemedicine can benefit from uRLLC.

@Marina

Absolutely. Telesurgery needs much more precision and ultra-latency. It is a question of lives.

And time response.

Yes, this value is close to real-world, if not blink of an eye of a surgeon when handling surgery equipment.

[AlexB]

Rethink the approach to 5G indoor coverage “The cost to MNOs adopting this approach could be close to zero, as the capex and opex for the radio network are covered by neutral hosts exploring the building owner paid business model. MNOs only need to bring in their spectrum assets to the shared networks. It is a risk-free way for them to unlock new business opportunities for delivering indoor services at predictable gigabit speeds with a high average revenue per user (ARPU) premium.”

Visit Source (and Download Analysis): Rethink the approach to 5G indoor coverage