I noticed in an Ericsson LTE network that the load balancing parameter is set to 0 from 700 MHz cells to AWS/1900, but it is set to 1 from 1900/AWS to 700 MHz.
Why is load balancing allowed from high band to low band but not the other way around?
The 700 MHz band, being a low-frequency band, typically provides better coverage due to its ability to penetrate buildings and travel longer distances. Conversely, 1900 MHz bands, which are higher-frequency, generally offer higher capacity but with more limited coverage. Enabling load balancing from high-frequency bands 1900 MHz to low-frequency bands 700 MHz ensures users in areas with weaker signal strength or limited coverage benefit from the robust characteristics of the 700 MHz band. This helps maintain a consistent user experience, particularly in challenging coverage areas.
However, restricting load balancing from the 700 MHz band to the 1900 MHz band seems a little bit strange . It might be a strategic decision to prevent overloading the higher-frequency bands, which could already be handling a significant traffic load in areas with strong coverage. Alternatively, this restriction might aim to preserve the 700 MHz band’s coverage advantage for users who rely on it most.
I recommend: consulting the Optimizer responsible for this setting to clarify the rationale behind the configuration. Before making any adjustments, conduct a thorough analysis of the capacity and radio conditions in the targeted area. Based on the findings, you could consider a trial adjustment to evaluate if it results in improved performance.