Fronthaul vs. Backhaul: The Sprint and the Marathon of 5G

Fronthaul and Backhaul both carry your data.

But not the same way.

One needs to be lightning-fast.
The other just needs to reach far.

We often lump fronthaul and backhaul together.
But they serve very different purposes in a 5G network.

Here’s how they really stack up:

:white_check_mark: Latency?

Fronthaul: ultra-low (<25 µs)
Backhaul: much higher (10 ms)

:white_check_mark: Bandwidth?

Fronthaul: 2.5–10 Gbps
Backhaul: 1–10 Gbps, but shared

:white_check_mark: Protocols?

Fronthaul: CPRI, eCPRI, IEEE 1914
Backhaul: Ethernet, IP, MPLS

:white_check_mark: Range?

Fronthaul: up to 40 km
Backhaul: up to 200 km

:white_check_mark: Jitter?

Fronthaul: <65 ns
Backhaul: ~1 µs

:white_check_mark: Waveform?

Fronthaul: uncompressed IQ samples
Backhaul: compressed packets

:white_check_mark: Topology?

Fronthaul: BBU to RRH, tight coupling
Backhaul: cell sites to core, flexible

:white_check_mark: Deployment?

Fronthaul: fiber-heavy
Backhaul: microwave, copper, fiber

:white_check_mark: Capacity?

Fronthaul: fewer links, more capacity
Backhaul: more links, less capacity

:white_check_mark: Monitoring?

Fronthaul: dedicated oversight
Backhaul: shared systems

:white_check_mark: Cost?

Fronthaul: expensive (high CAPEX/OPEX)
Backhaul: cost-effective

Fronthaul is a sprinter.
Backhaul is a marathon runner.

5G doesn’t just rely on fast speeds.
It relies on smart infrastructure.

Thanks for reading.

Fronthaul vs. Backhaul - The Sprint and the Marathon of 5G

LinkedIn: :point_down: