2.4 GHz feels stronger through walls while 5 GHz flies when you’re in the same room so which one has more range? Neither! on its own. Frequency helps predict free-space loss and penetration but real links live (or die) in clutter, interference, antennas and motion.
-
What Frequency Predicts and What It Doesn’t?
Lower frequency usually suffers less material loss and diffracts more, so 2.4 GHz often keeps SNR behind walls and around corners but frequency says nothing about spectrum congestion, device detuning or how users hold the product. Two bands with the same power can deliver very different reliability once the environment speaks. -
Lower Hertz ≠ Guaranteed Distance:
A 2.4 GHz link can still fail first if the band is saturated with Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and leakage from appliances. Conversely, 5 GHz can carry farther in open halls or long aisles thanks to wider, cleaner channels and better spatial reuse. “Further” depends on SNR after interference and fading not wavelength alone. -
Integration Changes Everything:
Real devices aren’t textbook radiators. Chassis currents, human grip, ground-plane size and nearby metal can warp patterns and mismatch one band more than the other. Building materials vary wildly too, glass, concrete and coated walls can punish 5 GHz or occasionally 2.4 GHz, enough to flip the outcome room by room. -
Critical Formulas:
a). Free-space path loss:
→ FSPL(dB) = 32.44 + 20·log₁₀(f_MHz) + 20·log₁₀(d_km)
b). Environment path loss model:
→ PL(d) ≈ PL(d₀) + 10·n·log₁₀(d/d₀) (n ≈ 2…4 indoors)
c). First Fresnel zone (keep it clear for LOS):
→ r₁ ≈ √(λ·d₁·d₂/d)
d). Link margin (what actually decides range):
→ LM = P_tx + G_tx + G_rx − PL − L_mat − L_fade − NF − SNR_req -
Real-World Outcomes:
- In dense apartments, 5 GHz wins. 2.4 GHz is crowded (Wi-Fi, BLE, microwaves) so the noise floor crushes MCS. 5 GHz has more clean channels so throughput stays higher despite slightly higher loss.
- In brick house, 2.4 GHz wins. Masonry and low-E glass attenuate 5 GHz much more. 2.4 GHz diffracts/penetrates better, preserving SNR across rooms and floors.
- In long warehouse aisles, 5 GHz wins. Mostly line of sight with directional panels favors 5 GHz. Cleaner spectrum sustains high MCS and tighter cell reuse.
- In wearables/handhelds, 2.4 GHz wins. Small antennas detune more at 5 GHz and the body absorbs it harder. 2.4 GHz stays resilient under grip and body shadowing.
Frequency is a knob, not a verdict. Design for the building, the traffic and the antennas you actually ship and pick the band that keeps SNR and capacity where users need them.
LinkedIn: 