4G Scheduling

4G Scheduling :receipt::memo:
[What, factors, types, challenges, and optimization]

LTE scheduling is the intelligent process of allocating radio resources (time, frequency, and power) to different UEs and services in both UL and DL directions.
:small_blue_diamond: It decides in 1 millisecond and sends it in PDCCH.
:small_blue_diamond:Scheduling Existing in eNB only.

:dart: Factors influencing scheduling…
QoS, CQI, Waiting Time (WT), Buffer Status (BS), User Priority, radio conditions, eNB configurations (power, MIMO, etc.), and available resources.

:dart: Scheduling types…
:small_orange_diamond:Static scheduling (depends on fixed resources).
:small_orange_diamond:Dynamic scheduling.
:small_orange_diamond:Semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) (for VoLTE).

:dart: Types of LTE Scheduling Algorithms…
:arrows_counterclockwise: Round Robin (RR): Simple and fairness-focused. Grants resources cyclically to each user. Great for ensuring basic fairness but might not maximize throughput.

:balance_scale: Proportional Fair (PF): Strikes a balance between fairness and throughput. Prioritizes users with better channel conditions relative to their past throughput. A popular choice for its efficiency.

:rocket: Enhanced Proportional Fair (EPF): An advanced version of PF, often incorporating QoS, CQI, Waiting Time (WT), and Buffer Status (BS) to make more informed scheduling decisions. Can significantly improve overall network performance.

:satellite: Maximum Carrier to Interference Ratio (Max C/I): Throughput centric. Prioritizes users with the best instantaneous channel quality (highest CQI) to maximize cell throughput. This may lead to some fairness problems.

:boxing_glove: Challenges in LTE Scheduling…
:chart_with_downwards_trend: Dynamic Channel Conditions: require fluctuating signal strength and interference require schedulers to be highly adaptive.

:bar_chart: Diverse QoS Requirements: From voice (VoLTE) to video streaming to IoT, each service has unique latency, bandwidth, and reliability needs.

:heavy_check_mark: Fairness vs. Efficiency Trade-off: Balancing the need to serve all users fairly while maximizing overall network capacity.

:abacus: Complexity and Real-time Operation: Schedulers must make decisions in 1 millisecond, demanding efficient algorithms and robust implementation.

:dart: Optimization Strategies…
:technologist: Advanced Algorithm Design: Continuously refining algorithms like EPF to better adapt to varying network conditions and user demands.

:page_with_curl: CQI Feedback Mechanisms: Accurate and timely CQI reporting is crucial for effective link adaptation and scheduling decisions.

:chart_with_upwards_trend: QoS Aware Scheduling: Implementing sophisticated mechanisms to prioritize traffic based on QoS Class Identifiers (QCIs) and service requirements.

:bar_chart: Dynamic Resource Allocation: Flexibly adjusting resource allocation based on real-time traffic patterns and network load.

LinkedIn: :point_down: