Check this must be parameter indicating idle %of UE.
Yes that’s true after erab success and other incoming are active user for that cell.
Not much diff in prb utilization.
You can try inter freq load balancing, it will give good result.
EutraninterfreqNcell.OverlapInd = Yes.
Is it activated?
RRC and active of 1775 is high than 1350.
Eutraninternfreq MLB indicator is allowed in all carriers.
Can you please send graph again value of freq not clear.
Ok 
Is it mMIMO or normal LTE site?
Basically you can shift user from 1775 to other layers.
You can use non gbr, pdcch load if exceed 60% utilization on 1775 then user shift to other layer using inter freq LB.
Normal 2 x 2 mini site.
CCE utilization is less.
It can be seen that PRB utilization is fine everything is idle issue.
Otherwise PRB utilization should be unbalanced.
Just plot user throughput vs no of users.
I’m seeing from user throughput point of view.
If we reduced no of user i.e. RRC user.
Then value can improve but come at cost of payload.
Plot CQI as well with RRC user, user throughput to see correlation.
Try to bring balance in user by pushing traffic.
Payload is high in 1775.
Yes, then above mentioned steps can be tried.
This is another case where payload is ame 1800.
Active user are high.
Checking RRC users.
Payload is same.
It is 100 percent utilized.
Not in all.
Is this default or we need to set?
Without u2000 is this project getting from front line.
Weird project: Ne backup data and kpi data we are getting - in more than 60 percent prb it’s better to go for prb based mlb utilization in that carrier.