Do you actually know how those jammers were replaced, reconfigured, repositioned or deactivated?
Jail admin just increased the intensity mistakenly, It was later reduced to previous value.
No repositioning, or anything but it impacted a huge area, and we somehow managed to improve subscriber perception by tuning pzeronominalpusch.
A service is a service as long as it can be mantained, beyond a certain range it cannot be maintain if you increase the the pzeronominalpusch.
Service cannot be maintained due to increased UL noise floor.
But user will remain camped on LTE with no impact on cell range.
There is no change in cell range. Only knee point shifted towards left indicating UE get power limited abit earlier.
Thanks.
I did not discuss here about the cell range parameter or cell radius parameter. But about the service radius.
In the idea that if you increase the pzeronominalpusch on a cell it is likely you will have service radius reduced.
This is the point from where discussion started. 
.
And now we are on same page 
Cell Edge UEs may face difficulty in communication, but no impact on Cell Range.
Just one more remark:
Huawei is using pzeronominalpusch = -67 but other vendors use -80 or -90.
It is not a must to be -67 dBm.
Nokia is -80.
How do you differentiate between interference from traffic between cells and from time of flight interference?